Showing posts with label peace. Show all posts
Showing posts with label peace. Show all posts

Saturday, November 19, 2011

Teaching children about the costs of violence and war.


There are many ways to teach children about the costs of violence and war, but it is an effort that parents usually must make on their own, as public schools, funded by the governments which wage war, are not encouraged to engage in critical thinking about the conventional wisdom on violence.

The best way to study the costs of violence and war is by outlining the diverse types of costs for these activities and then devoting individual time to each type. For parents seeking such an outline, here is a beginning. Please feel free to add (through comments) additional resources.


THE ECONOMIC COSTS OF WAR
War and state-sponsored violence cost money. Since money is not in endless supply, money spent on war is money not spent on other things, like Social Security, Medicaid, and other elements of the federal budget.

THE SOCIAL COSTS OF WAR
War and state-sponsored violence provide legal justifications for the killing of other human beings, both the innocent and the "guilty". War often encourages citizens to nourish anger and hatred towards entire groups of human beings. Many innocent people are harmed in the process.
  • Explore how a Liberian woman has been affected by ongoing wars in her country. 
  • Learn how to keep anger under control so that it does not tear apart your family or community with this printable lesson.
  • War and violence often distance us from fellow humans in the name of "difference" and judgement. Learn how to love and respect human diversity with this printable lesson.
  • War destroys nature as well as human homes and cities. Cultivate a respect for the natural world with this printable lesson plan.
  • Families are destroyed by war every day. Look at Iraq Body Count to see how many families have been torn apart or suffered from this recent war.

THE SPIRITUAL COSTS OF WAR
War and state-sponsored violence often call upon us to ignore our ethical and religious commitments. This can cause spiritual trauma and distress for both soldiers and the innocent victims of war and violence.
  • Discuss the spiritual and emotional costs of war by exploring the online art exhibit, Windows and Mirrors, which reveals the struggles of the people and soldiers in Afghanistan.
  • For Christians, peace is the presence of God. What does this mean in terms of our faith?
  • Learn how the recent war in Iraq has traumatized American soldiers by reading their stories. Also find out how noncombatants are helping spiritually-wounded soldiers recover their lives and faith.
  • Think about a soldier's heart. Write about how it must feel to kill a fellow human being. How can you share love and support with soldiers and veterans in a way that does not encourage spiritual trauma?

THE POLITICAL COSTS OF WAR
War and state-sponsored violence reveal a model of "justice for the victors" which institutionalizes an unfair and unjust conception of right and wrong. For example, if one country kills millions of civilians during a war but then wins the war, it will not be forced to account for its crimes in an international court of law. Only the losing countries will be required to account for their crimes and make reparations. The goal of reducing civilian casualties becomes less important than the overall goal of winning the war at all costs.

In addition to this model, you can explore an ethic of peace a little more deeply with the following resources:

Tuesday, March 8, 2011

An excerpt from our conversation with Mark Johnson.

Mark Johnson, the Executive Director of the Fellowship of Reconciliation, met with Circles of Peace members in Tuscaloosa earlier this year. The conversation was a lengthy and interesting one; I hope to have the entire transcription available online soon. Until then, here is an excerpt from the conversation:

John Cooper: I feel that Christians are largely culpable for World War II also because if Christians had followed the principles of loving one another and the principles of Jesus Christ and they were, in fact, two supposedly Christian nations fighting and killing each other. Christians in Germany, Christians in the United States, as well as other faiths, did the same thing. I would say that our hands are not clean and we need to repent of our attitudes of supporting war and violence.

Mirza Beg: That is true for all religions. Actually, more people of the same faith have killed each other than persons of one faith killing persons of another faith. Nobody’s hands are clean in that regard.

Michael Fox: We should point out also the German hostility to religion, in particular to Christianity. They were rapidly discarding Christianity at the time of the rise of Hitler. I’m not necessarily sure its fair to say Germans were Christians fighting other Christians.
Things had changed by the time Hitler had risen to power and invaded Poland. I would like to fine-tune the doctor’s question. Granted, were certain ideas in place and certain powers at the time, Hitler could have been prevented. But I believe the question was more about if those ideas hadn’t been tried, or even if they had not been, what you do when you meet the reality of a Hitler. Not how to prevent a Hitler from arising, but dealing with a Hitler that has arisen.

Mark Johnson: I think there is an important context for that question as well because we tend to live in the past as if some of these problems were no longer with us. The fact of the matter is more Africans have been killed in the last ten or twenty years through genocide than people killed in all of the second World War. We continue to use practices that are horrendous and horrible and so we’re still confronted with that question today. There are leaders who are responsible for those deaths. In fact, one of the more interesting questions is-- How is it possible that a small number of individuals are able to shape the response of masses of people, to draw machetes and kill their brothers and sisters and wives and pastors and so on?
Another answer is the answer that Dietrich Bonhoeffer gave-- that when you’re faced by inexorable evil, some people are called to sin. Bonhoeffer chose to return to Germany and join a plot to assassinate Hitler and he knew that was a violation of God’s will, that it was a sin. In a salvationist sense, he would go to hell. But that was his choice to make. I heard an interesting and challenging argument the other evening in a circle like this in Washington, DC by a socialist who was arguing that the only reason that pacifists are present in the conversation, that nonviolence is in the discussion, is because of the threat of violence of others in those cultures-- that they provide the cover for pacifism or nonviolence. A challenging thesis.... a sort of chicken-and-egg kind of thesis. I’m acknowledging that the question has concrete experiences but it’s still hypothetical, especially retroactively in terms of someone like Hitler. And Bonhoeffer gave the answer.